Really strange question about Michael Jackson. Please tell me wether or not it is true?

So there are so many things said about Michael Jackson that you never really know what is true and what isn't. And I definitely have my doubts about this story. A friend of mine told me that she saw an interview on tv w/ one of the investigators in the Michael Jackson child molestation case. She claims that the investigator said the reason the story was so believable was b/c Chandler described Michael as having a dark penis as opposed to a light skinned one (which would've matched the rest of his skin color). When pictures of Michael's genitals were taken, it revealed that that part of Chandler's testimony is accurate. Is that true?Really strange question about Michael Jackson. Please tell me wether or not it is true?
i have never heard this before but even if it is true this doesn't prove anything. michael had vitiligo. jordan or i should say his father (since he probably told him what to say) would know that. vitiligo causes blotches on ur skin and it usally starts on the hands and face, so michael had to even out his skin tone to match the blotches. michael's entire body would not be ';white.'; btw there was no accurate match with jordan's description and michael's genitals. there was and still is absolutely no evidence that michael was a child molester because he WASN'TReally strange question about Michael Jackson. Please tell me wether or not it is true?
FALSE FALSE FALSE





CHANDLER BASTARD GOT IT COMPLETELY WRONG!





chandler's description was that Michael was circumcised, which he wasn't. BIG difference





and its not surprising that they assumed Michael to have been circumcised since evan chandler was fully jewish


(all jewish male undergo circumcision straight after birth)





its quite interesting how articles mentions 'a detailed description' chandler made without saying it was incorrect.





bottom line is those evil bastards are pure evil
Your a true fan right why should you believe this piece of crap interview you know how the media is. No it's not true and we the smart ones shouldn't even be worrying about it because there is no reason to even think he is a child molester.
NO, anyone who wants have a testimony against mj will research and have known that


and those who knew about vitiligo knows that not all of the skin is whitened
Michael Jackson was acquitted of ALL the charges.
HELL NO. THOSE KIDS ARE FUHKING LIARS!!! CHILDREN ARE LIARS! I HOPE THOSE LYING BASTARDS GET WAT THE DESERVE! MICHAEL WOULD NEVER DO SUCH A THING!
nOooo,


that is probably a lie like everything else.


Why would his thing be dark and skin be light?
Oh gosh. Not only is this a lie but it also put a terrible image in head. *shudders*
If it was true WHICH IT WAS NOT MJ would have been convicted, and Jordan wouldn't of taken the money
No, definetley not true.
if it was true michael would went to prison he is Innocent and he is dead people can't accuse him now
who cares leave my baby alone
wtf?


no...!
No. if it was true he would have been convicted
no
The pumpkin head say absolutely yes and thats why MJ used his fame and money to get away with it.
MJ has a penis??????
Yes, it's true.

hair spray